Choke Ring Antennas

Hello All,

View Details

Over the past couple of years I have seen several references indicating that the reason all GPS units intended for precision survey applications use a choke-ring antenna is that a properly designed GPS choke ring antenna will cut multi-path reception down very significantly. Other references I have seen indicate that using a choke-ring antenna results in a moderate improvement in GPSDO performance.

Can any list members comment on this? If a choke-ring antenna does improve GPSDO performance, what degree of improvement can be expected? Enough to be worthwhile? Would switching to a properly designed choke-ring antenna on my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO be worthwhile? My house is surrounded by large trees and my roof-top GPS antenna does not have a foliage free view of the sky until about 40-degrees above the horizon. I have set a horizon elevation mask of 30 degrees in my T-bolt software but have wondered if multipath through the remaining tree-tops may still be a slight problem.

Only very rarely do used GPS choke-ring antennas show up on eBay and they typically ask around $600 to $800.

My good friend Bob Johnson, WB4JZM, tracked down some references to GPS choke-ring antennas which he sent to me (Thanks, Bob!!) and I have taken the liberty of appending some of his post below.

So, can any list members shed any light on the efficacy of switching to a choke-ring antenna on a GPSDO unit?

Mike Baker

WA4HFR

Gainesville, Florida

Bob said:

It looks like this article describes an antenna that is easier to design and manufacture than a choke-ring antenna, with similar performance:

http://mwrf.com/Articles/Print.cfm?ArticleID=

The standard choke-ring design comes from JPL, and may be public domain in the U.S. Certainly there must be a published patent somewhere that will give enough detail to build one (otherwise, it isn't a valid patent). They are normally milled from a solid aluminum billet, but you could use other fabrication methods and make your own. And you seem to have enough test equipment to test it&#;

An article on choke-ring theory: http://javad.com/jns/index.html?/jns/technology/Choke%20Ring%20Theory.html

Improvements on the JPL design from the same company: http://javad.com/jns/index.html?/jns/technology/Single-Depth%20Low-Multipath%20Choke%20Ring.html

A choke-ring design with improved reception of low-elevation signals: http://www.novatel.com/Documents/Papers/3D_choke_ring.pdf

This looks like an excellent article. Of interest in this article are the photos of different choke rings they evaluated: it appears that the critical factor is the depth of the grooves, and there is some disagreement about the optimum depth, so obviously that isn't critical either! In other words, build your own, it will almost certainly provide some benefit, possibly more than an expensive commercial unit.

A patent that appears to have enough detail to build your own: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/.html

Possibly the greatest difficulty in building your own is the actual GPS antenna: for best results, you need to know the phase center of the antenna, and mount it at the center of the choke ring (for that matter, the antenna needs to have a single phase center: but real-world designs have different phase centers in different dimensions). And the choke ring should be designed for a specific antenna: you can't just buy a choke ring off eBay and stick any old antenna on it and get optimum results (although it is likely to be an improvement over the same antenna without a choke ring if you mount it correctly).

Discussion of phase center and precision GPS work: http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/ANTCAL/images/summary.html

Receivers

Title Antennas Edited by GMV Level Advanced Year of Publication

From a user perspective, antennas are the main interface between the GNSS Space Segment (the satellite constellations) and the User Segment (GNSS receivers), as they are responsible for capturing the L-band signals transmitted from space. Antennas requirements can range from gain vs. azimuth and elevation, multipath and interference rejection, or stability of the electrical phase centre, to size, shape and environmental constraints.

Typically, the antennas used in GNSS receivers are formed by a radiating element, mounted on a ground plane, followed by an amplifier and protected by a radome:

• the radiating element is responsible for the antenna bandwidth and radiating characteristics,
• the ground plane conditions the radiation pattern shape, foremost at low elevation angles,
• the amplifier sets the receiver noise figure,
• the radome affects the phase centre.

Due to the characteristics of GNSS systems, receiver antennas are typically Right-Hand Circularly Polarized[1] (RHCP) antennas, and the spacial reception pattern is near hemispherical: this configuration enables user reception of satellite signals in any azimuthal direction, and from zenith to horizon, thus maximizing satellite visibility.

Antenna configurations

Different applications may require different types of antenna design, technology and location[2]. In fact, as show in Figure 1, antennas can range from large roof-mounted antennas (e.g. for a static open sky view) to embedded antennas in receiver boards (e.g. for mobile handheld devices).

The most common types of antennas in terms of implementation of antenna elements, ground planes, are:

Figure 1: Examples of GNSS antenna types: rooftop Radome (left), embedded Patch (top-right), Choke Ring design (bottom-right).

Examples of GNSS antenna types: rooftop Radome (left), embedded Patch (top-right), Choke Ring design (bottom-right).

Figure 2: View of the antennas at Galileo Control Centre in Fucino, Italy (Contents ESA).

View of the antennas at Galileo Control Centre in Fucino, Italy (Contents ESA).

• Patch Antennas: Patch antennas are often used in handheld mobile devices, such as Portable Navigation Devices (PND) or smartphones, since the antenna is built as a low-profile thin microstrip (i.e. patch), suitable for small form-factor devices. Microstrip patches or aperture-coupled patches can be single frequency or dual frequency, but also broadband. Patches are not circularly polarized by nature, so they achieve circular polarization by quadrature excitation of two linearly polarized ports. The quality of the circular polarization depends largely on the feeding network and may be sensitive to fabrication issues, and the crosspolarization near the horizon tends to be high. They provide an excellent form factor (size and weight), and are used in most aviation GNSS antennas satisfying ARINC 743[3] standard.

• Turnstile Antennas: The turnstile antenna consists of two dipoles fed in 90° phase. A horizontal turnstile antenna in free space is vertically polarized in its plane, and has opposite circular polarizations above and below. Therefore the antenna requires a ground plane for geodetic applications. When combined with a choke ring ground plane, it is a very common element in geodetic applications.

• Helical Antennas: Helical antennas are typically built as a conducting wire around a cylindrical or conical core, in a helix form, and can be used with or without a ground plane, depending on the configuration. In GNSS receivers, the helix antennas can be used as directional antennas, with a radiation pattern along the axis of the antenna.

• Spiral Antennas: The equiangular planar spiral is one of the prototypical "frequency-independent" antennas, so it offers excellent bandwidth. The antenna is circularly polarized by nature, although the quality of the polarization may depend on the feeding arrangement. Since the basic element radiates equally in both hemispheres, a ground plane of some kind is required.

• Radome Antennas: As the name suggests, in this configuration the antenna elements are housed in a hemispherical-like dome (the radome). Radomes are usually added to protect the antenna when the site where it is installed demands it (e.g. in roof-mounted installations) due to weather conditions, antenna security, or wildlife concerns. Typically, hemispherical radomes are used, because they have little effect on the phase centre stability and symmetry, and non-hemispherical radomes are usually avoided, except when the shape is required by site characteristics (e.g. conical radomes for snow rejection). Antenna phase centre calibration should be performed with the radome.

• Choke Ring Antennas: A choke ring antenna design consists in surrounding a central antenna element with several concentric conductive rings, enclosed in a protective dome. Its design is notable for the ability to reject multipath and low elevation signals (including reflections on the ground). Choke Ring antennas reflects signals that come from below, and draw surface wave signals into the choke channels, where they are cancelled or reflected away from the receiving element.

• Resistive Plane Antennas: The resistive plane antenna uses electrical resistance (rather than frequency-tuned rings as Choke Ring antennas) to keep unwanted signals from reaching the antenna element. Signals that strike the plane lose all energy before they reach the element and cause interference. Resistive Plane antennas provide similar performances as Choke Ring antennas, but with less weight and cost.

• Phased-Array Antennas: Phased-array antennas are mostly used for military or high-end applications, and consist of numerous antenna elements arranged in an array pattern. Each signal from an antenna in the array can be processed by introducing dynamic phase shifts, and when the outputs of the array are summed, the effective radiation pattern can be maximized in some directions and nulled in other (e.g. inserting nulls in the antenna pattern can help adjusting to jamming threats). Furthermore, beam steering techniques can be used to increase dynamically the antenna gain in a given direction, e.g. of a given satellite. This technique can be used in ground reference antennas in order to maximize the antenna gain.

• Parabolic Antennas: Resembling popular TV and communications satellite dish antennas, parabolic antennas use a parabolic reflecting surface to direct the radio waves. The parabolic antenna is highly directive, so RF signals coming from the satellites can be received from one particular direction only. Its directive build structure and high gain make this type of antenna suitable for Ground Segment stations, such as monitoring or uplink stations, as shown in Figure 2.

Applications

An alternative distinction of GNSS antennas[4] is in terms of the envisaged application:

mide supply professional and honest service.

• Geodetic Antennas: Survey and geodetic applications typically require fixed high-accuracy receivers and antennas, so it is common for multi-frequency / multi-constellation choke-ring antennas to be used for best performance.

• Rover Antennas: Rover antennas are typically used in land survey, forestry, construction, and other portable or mobile applications, hence they require a trade-off between accuracy and portability. Due to the need for mobility, the antenna is usually mounted on a handheld pole, stand or tripod. In general, due to size and weight constraints, choke ring antennas are not a good solution for rover applications, so higher phase center variations are often seen in rover antennas.

• Handheld Receiver Antennas: These antennas are found in most current smartphones and portable navigation devices, and the key design drivers are size, cost and power consumption constraints. Usually single-frequency antennas, they are available in a range of implementations such as helical or patch antennas, both passive and active (see section below for details).

Characteristics

Antennas used in GNSS receivers aim at capturing L-band signals and therefore their design should take into account signal bandwidth, centre frequency, desired response, transfer function, multipath mitigation, and electromechanical factors. Table 1 shows a few relations between antenna applications and characteristics.

Table 1: GNSS antenna applications and characteristics.   Geodetic Rover Handheld Frequency Bands Single to multiband Single to multiband Singleband Bandwidth Broadband Narrow to Broadband Narrowband Radiation Pattern Controlled Controlled Not controlled Multipath suppression High Medium None Sensitivity High Medium to high Low Interference Handling High rejection Good rejection Minimal rejection Phase centre Very important Important Not important Dimensions Large Portable Very small Weight Heavy Portable Lightweight Cost High Medium Low

Antenna Power

In general, GNSS antennas do not need any electrical power to operate, and are referred to as passive antennas. Typical scenarios for passive antennas are mobile devices, where power consumption is a critical issue. However, passive antennas must connect to the receiver's front end with very low losses, since there is no amplification mechanism involved at signal reception.

In applications in which the antenna can be away from the receiver (e.g. rooftop antennas), signal amplification can be implemented in the antenna itself, and for that fact they are called active antennas. Their purpose is to amplify the received signal to compensate for potential losses in long coaxial cables, at the cost of higher power consumption (power is usually delivered from the front end through the coaxial cable itself). In this approach, a Low-Noise Amplifier (LNA) is usually added to the antenna setup, in order to ensure a low noise figure in the signals to process. An example of active antenna use is for indoor reradiating purposes, where an active antenna inside a building reradiates the signals coming from another antenna, placed outside the building.

Radiation Pattern

Figure 3: Example of a patch antenna pattern.

Example of a patch antenna pattern.

GNSS signals use Right Hand Circular Polarization (RHCP), but antennas are not perfect, so a RHCP antenna will pick up some Left Hand Circular Polarization (LHCP) energy as well. In radiation terms, RHCP is referred to as the co-polar component, and LHCP is referred as the cross-polar component. The typical radiation pattern coverage is around 160º, resulting in low gain for signals coming in at low elevation angles, as shown in Figure 3 for a patch antenna. This pattern aims at maximizing the gain at zenith, decreasing to near unity at an elevation angle of around 10º-15º, and to negative gains below the elevation threshold (sometimes referred to as elevation mask).

Real-world GNSS antennas experience a gain roll-off of 10 to 20 dB from broadside (90º elevation) to the horizon (0º elevation). At zenith, the ratio of the vertical electric field to the horizontal electric field response is near unity (0 dB); this ratio is referred to as the axial ratio[5] (AR). The AR tends to degrade towards lower elevations, and it can reach less than 3 to 6 dB at 10° elevation for a high-performance antenna.

Multipath

Signals sent from GNSS satellites will directly arrive at the antenna but they also may be reflected off the ground, buildings or other obstacles, arriving at the antenna multiple times and delayed in time. This phenomenon is called multipath, and since it degrades position accuracy, it should be avoided or reduced. Multipath signals can basically come from three directions: the ground, hitting the back of the antenna, the ground or an object, hitting the antenna at a low elevation, or an object, hitting the antenna at a high elevation.

In specular reflections, the reflected signal may change its polarization with respect to the original one, i.e. depending on the material and on the angle of incidence, a RHCP signal can be reflected as a LHCP signal. The multipath susceptibility of an antenna can then be quantified, with respect to the antenna&#;s radiation pattern characteristics, by the multipath ratio (MPR). The multipath ratio is computed as the ratio between the RHCP gain at the satellite signal incident angle with respect to the sum of the RHCP and LHCP gains at the multipath signal incident angle.

Gain roll-off towards the lower elevations helps suppressing multipath signals: however, a good AR is always a must, since gain roll-off alone is insufficient.

Phase Centre

Another important design factor for antennas is the phase centre. In fact, when a receiver determines a position solution, it is actually estimating the position of the electrical phase centre of the antenna, where the signals are captured, regardless of the distance from the antenna the receiver device really is. This electrical phase centre should not be mistaken with the physical phase centre: although the latter can be observed and is a physical constant, the first may vary, depending on the direction of the signal arrival.

Determining the phase centre is important in GNSS systems, particularly when millimeter positioning resolution is desired; nevertheless, for well-designed high-end GNSS antennas, phase centre variations in azimuth are small and in the order of few millimetres (the vertical phase offsets are typically 10 mm or less). See the articles on antenna phase centre and receiver antenna phase centre for more details.

Interference Handling

An out-of-band interferer is an RF source outside of the GNSS frequency bands, which can drive the LNA into its nonlinear range, and the LNA starts to operate as a multiplier or comb generator. RF filters can reduce the out-of-band signals by tens of dBs, which is enough in most cases. Of course, filters add insertion loss, amplitude and phase ripple, all of which degrade receiver performance. In-band interferers can be the third-order mixing products, or simply an RF source that transmits inside the GNSS bands. If these are relatively weak, the receiver will handle them; from a certain power level on, however, commercial receivers can do nothing about them.

Furthermore, antenna arrays can use beamforming techniques[6] to create nulls in the radiation pattern in the direction of a-priori known interferers &#; this technique is often used in military applications.

Noise and Out of Band Rejection

The signals received by the antenna are very weak. For instance, in GPS, the minimum received power is &#;158.5 dBW (for L1) and &#;164.5 dBW (for L2), for signals arriving at 5º elevation. Furthermore, the cable and the receiver elements generate noise that can affect the signal. To avoid reducing this effect, the first element following the antenna is usually a Low Noise Amplifier (LNA), so that the power of the GNSS signal is greater than the noise generated by the cable and the receiver elements.

Adding the fact that Out of Band signals need to be rejected or attenuated to prevent the saturation of the amplifiers, and that the antenna does not provide a good close Out of Band rejection, a pass band filter can be placed before the first amplifier. This operation, however, will degrade the Noise Figure, so there is a trade-off in the design of the antenna LNA between the Noise Figure and the Out of Band Rejection. Typically, the compromise is reached by distributing the filtering across the LNA in two stages.

Signal Bandwidth

Besides electrical considerations, GNSS RF section must also take into account the signal structure in terms of RF spectrum and bandwidth, and should be selected not only in accordance with the front end specifications, but also with the envisaged usage and application. Typical GPS antennas are able to process signal bandwidth of around 1% to 2% of the signal center frequency (yielding over 20 MHz bandwidth in L1). These values are able to fit most GNSS signals and therefore the limitations on the signal bandwidth is usually concentrated in the front-end block, keeping in mind that both antenna and front-end blocks contribute to this bandwidth[7].

Front end connection

The antenna signal provided to the front end is received as a low-power signal, and is typically amplified and filtered before entering the down-conversion and sampling process. In the case of the antenna being far from the receiver, for physical constraints or application necessity, special attention should be drawn to the choice of the connecting cable.

Table 3: Example of coaxial cable types and losses [dB / 100m].   915 MHz 1.2 GHz 2.4 GHz RG-58 54.1 69.2 105.6 RG-8X 42.0 52.8 75.8 LMR-400 12.8 15.7 22.3 LMR-600 8.2 10.2 14.4 1 5/8" LDF 2.5 3.1 4.6

Coaxial cables are built in many different ways, with different materials, with or without special shielding, and specify losses in units of power and length per frequency range - typical values are in the form of "X dB/100 m @ Y MHz". Requirements like cable length, impedance, antenna gain and power supply (for the case of active antennas) need to be taken into account to minimize signal losses. For illustrative purposes, an example of the loss ranges at stake[8] is shown in Table 3. In this example, from a signal loss point of view, the "1 5/8" LDF" cable would have less losses in the 1.2 - 1.6 GHz range of GNSS signals, and should be considered for connecting an antenna to the front end.

Related articles

References

The company is the world’s best MINI Choke ring antenna supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.