Thinking of Automating?

Author: Molly

May. 13, 2024

Agriculture

Thinking of Automating?

Thinking of Automating?

Thinking of Automating?

David Kuack

When talking about which country has the most high-tech automation for controlled environment food production, the Netherlands would likely be top of mind. Chris Higgins, president of Hort Americas, a commercial horticultural supply company in Bedford, Texas, said a problem that often occurs with controlled environment food production is that the industry tends to talk about high tech and low tech without regard to what an individual grower may need.

“The reality on the farm side is we should be talking about right tech. Many people in the industry have allowed a Venlo glass greenhouseVenlo glass greenhouse to dictate how U.S. growers think about technology in most high-tech applications,” Chris said. “Some U.S. growers may think because they don’t have Venlo greenhouses they can’t have high-tech operations.”

Chris talked about the hundreds of acres of strawberries grown in high tunnels in California equipped with raised gutters on fence posts as proof that not everything about an operation has to be high tech.

“The reason these high-tunnel structures work so well for controlled environment strawberry production is because the climate for production is almost perfect,” he added. “Why should growers build greenhouses if they aren’t needed? Does that mean that this technology is low tech?”

For example, he said, the definition of high tech may not apply in this case if referring to controlling the temperature and humidity. But the high tunnels may be equipped with a high-tech irrigation system. Chris noted these strawberry growers are looking to invest in advanced robotics systems that can assist in harvesting, spraying or transportation, as well.

“Requirements of technology will be based more on solving different problems for farms of different sizes based on what that farm can afford to support growth or profitability,” he said. “Why invest in high tech if a grower doesn’t need it?”

Lowering labor, energy costs

Chris pointed out the two biggest areas growers have issues with today and over the last few years are labor and utility costs.

“The inflation tied to those two categories on the growers’ balance sheets has outpaced the cost of price increases farms can put on the products they produce,” he said. “If there is technology that allows growers to address labor and utilities, that is where they should be making their investments.”

Whenever food is being grown in a controlled environment in a climate that isn’t conducive to production year-round, energy in the form of utilities is being used to manipulate the climate, he said. This could include supplementing light or lowering or raising the temperature. Savings on utilities is highly dependent on the geographical location and what utility a grower is using the most. These calculations for energy costs are relatively easy to determine.

“How much energy savings are being realized? How many running hours are on a piece of equipment per year?” he asked. “A grower can determine the savings versus the investment in new equipment and if that number is between three to five years payback, the grower should seriously consider an upgrade. The only thing that is guaranteed is the cost of labor and the cost of energy will continue to increase.”

Improving efficiency

While labor and energy costs are two of the biggest issues growers are facing, Joe Swartz, vice president at AmHydro, a horticultural hydroponic systems designer and builder in Arcata, California, said there’s no single automation solution to resolving these issues.

“There are so many factors involved,” Joe said. “Not only the type of automation, but also the level of automation and the specific automation application. Automation application in some instances involves automating repetitive labor tasks. In other cases, logic or using some artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning focusing on data collection and/or analysis is driving what a grower needs.”

Clockwise from top left: One objective of the Small Greenhouse and Farm Technology project is to assist small growers to identify their current level of technology adoption and help them determine where to make their next equipment/automation investment. ■ High-tech controlled environment food production can vary for the crop and geographic location. Depending on location and climate, high tunnels or greenhouses can be equipped with high-tech environmental controls and irrigation systems. ■ A grower pain point is moving material from one area to another or throughout a whole facility. Small growers can invest in carts or trolleys, while larger operations may invest in automated conveyor belts. ■ Since labor and energy costs will continue to increase, technology that enables growers to address these issues is where they should consider making their automation investments.

Joe said most growers come to AmHydro to improve or increase efficiency, looking for cost savings through process efficiencies, as well as finding better ways to implement food safety or workplace safety. What it essentially boils down to is either making more money for the growers or freeing up more time or a combination of those two.

“We don’t have growers who come to us and say we need to cut down on our labor. It’s much more of a holistic approach. How can they streamline and make their operations work better?” Joe said. “That is one of the things that drives what growers should be looking at with regards to automation. In order to streamline their operations, growers need to produce more using less, and they need to do it faster and better.”

Reducing pain points

Joe said many existing growers are looking to cut their costs and need to lower their labor requirements.

“Labor has become a pain point for a lot of growers,” he said, adding many existing growers feel they have to automate specific processes because of the labor costs. They’re hearing from companies out there that are creating automation equipment and essentially telling growers to purchase this automation technology because it’s so advanced.

“We’re commercial growers at AmHydro, so we are looking at the big picture of how we improve a process. A lot of times we will see something in a process—this could be a method or actual technology that has been implemented and is causing the problem,” Joe said. “We are trying to make growers successful. Sometimes it only takes a little nudge in the right direction or some guidance in ways where they can fix the problem with the tools they already have.”

He said another common pain point facing all size growers is material handling. Whether it’s an automated system that moves plants throughout an operation or moves product from one section to another, he said, material handling applies across the board for all size operations. This includes the small grower who’s invested in a couple carts or monorail trollies to save on labor and create a safer working environment. For larger operations, improving material handling may incorporate automated conveyor systems that move everything from plants to equipment around a facility.

“This can also include processing equipment used in packing areas, such as container-filling and packaging machines, as well as palletizing and shipping logistics automation,” he noted. “Other considerations might include crop scouting or health analysis, which could involve automation in dosing systems covering nutrition and water management.”

Advocating for small growers

For small-scale controlled environment growers who are doing both outdoor field and indoor greenhouse food crops, the decision where to spend their money on equipment and automation can be even more daunting.

“Growers face tough decisions over whether to spend limited dollars outdoors or indoors,” said Peter Konjoian, founder of Konjoian’s Horticulture Education Services in Andover, Massachusetts. Peter grew up on a 5-acre family farm and was involved with operating a 55,000-sq.-ft. greenhouse used for ornamental plant production. He recently started the Small Greenhouse and Farm Technology (SGAFT) project. He’s working with Michelle Klieger, an agricultural economist and strategist, to provide growers with insight as to the factors that need to be considered when making equipment-buying decisions.

“How does the potential of more crop turns in the greenhouse compare to seasonal outdoor production?” Peter said. “The answer can identify where the investment in technology should be made.”

The SGAFT website will provide educational materials tailored to smaller operations. The website will show growers what state-of-the-art technology is and where it’s headed, but most of the information will focus on the technology that they can afford to implement in their operations.

“One objective of the project is to help small growers embrace the big picture, identify their current level of technology adoption and target what’s next,” he said. “Understanding where they are and what the next step is results in better decisions about where to spend their next dollar.”

Peter is working on describing automation technology within several different categories, including irrigation, environmental controls and glazing. Which category is going to return the most on a grower’s investment and which is going to eliminate or remove some of the human error involved in growing quality crops?

“Each category has its technology ladder and each ladder identifies a progressive increase in technology from entry level on the bottom step to state-of-the-art on the highest,” he said. “There’s never enough money to do everything, so making good decisions is key.

“Another objective is managing the pressure small growers place on themselves trying to achieve the highest level of technology in one step. We don’t skip steps climbing an actual ladder, that’s dangerous and irresponsible.”

A consideration that Michelle has emphasized is where growers are going to purchase their next hour of time.

“Growers also benefit from understanding where their next dollar will buy that coveted extra hour of time to be more productive,” Peter added.  

 

David Kuack is a freelance technical writer in Fort Worth, Texas. He can be reached at dkuack@gmail.com.

 

Choose The Right Greenhouse Style

Advertisement

Editor’s Note: Dr. Kacira is an associate professor in the Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department and Controlled Environment Agriculture Center at the University of Arizona.

Many elements must be taken into consideration when choosing the type of greenhouse to construct. Numerous factors for greenhouse design and technology selection must be looked at before building. Some things to consider include: market size and infrastructure in the region; climate of the site; plant requirements; water quality and accessibility; cost of land; zoning restrictions; availability of materials, equipment, and services; accessible labor source; and capital availability for investment, economics, and marketing.

The anticipated production quantity and quality also play a role when selecting a design. A reasonable balance needs to be established based on market demand, grower skills, expected economic return, and level of greenhouse technology selected for crop production.

Greenhouse styles can vary from small stand-alone structures to large gutter-connected greenhouses. Greenhouse designs can be simply classified as attached (i.e. lean-to), free standing (i.e. even-span, uneven span, Quonset, arch), and ridge-furrow or gutter connected (i.e. sawtooth, venlo). There are many designs and structures to select from, thus it is important to become familiar with the advantages and disadvantages of each. Here is a brief rundown of some of the styles available to growers.

Free Standing Styles
Free standing greenhouses are either an A-frame type or feature an arch/curvilinear roof shape. Arch roof structures provide good light transmission and are less costly to construct than peak-roof structures. Arch-roof greenhouses (also known as gothic) are also adaptable to both rigid and flexible glazing materials.

Arch-type structures can be modified into several designs. For instance, Quonset greenhouses when designed low to the ground can be used as cold frames for nursery purposes or as high tunnel greenhouses for vegetable production. The glazing is usually plastic. Quonset sidewall height is low, which can restrict storage space and headroom. This type of greenhouse can be placed on columns, enabling plants to grow taller to meet crop requirements.

The gothic-type greenhouse is similar to that of the Quonset but it has a “gothic” shape, featuring an arch and a pointed ridge. This shape allows more headroom at the sidewall than does the Quonset, and it can prevent snow build-up on the roof in colder climates.

Ridge And Furrow Styles
The ridge and furrow type greenhouse consists of a number of even span greenhouses connected along the length of the greenhouse. All shared walls are removed providing more growing space. These greenhouses are sometimes called gutter-connected. The ridge and furrow configuration is applicable to most of the commercial style greenhouses used for floriculture and vegetable production.

Gutter-connected greenhouses are less expensive to build, conserve ground area, and require less heating cost per ground area compared to stand-alone structures. In addition, gutter-connected greenhouses have less roof and wall area relative to floor area, so they are more energy-efficient. There are some disadvantages, however, including reduced light due to shadow from eaves and other structural elements, and snow accumulation over the eaves.

Another modified version of a ridge and furrow greenhouse is the Venlo style. The gable ends of Venlo structures are very narrow. The slim gable end allows for thinner bar use, and wider, single panes of glass glazing to be used on the roof. The Venlo style construction allows improved light transmission, enabling a high percentage of winter light to reach the crop. These structures originate from Dutch horticulture and are used widely in the Netherlands; however, they are also adopted by growers in Northern climates where reduced winter sunlight tends to be a limiting factor for crop growth.

Retractable Roof Or Open Roof
Designed as flat roof or A-frame type, retractable roof greenhouses can be used for basic protection of crops or as a complete crop production system with stationary or retractable insect screening, curtains for shading, heat retention, and perimeter walls with roll-up curtains with insect screening. They can allow the grower to open the structure completely or partially, providing higher rates of ventilation as well as more light for the crop. Generally used for ridge-furrow style structures, retractable-roof greenhouses have minimal climate control.

Offering the best of both worlds, open-roof greenhouses provide a natural environment for crops when the outside climate is suitable, and provide an artificial and protected environment when the outside is too cold or hot for crop production. Greenhouse air temperature can be maintained within one or two degrees of outside temperature with minimal or no energy required.
Often used by growers of perennials, baskets, and other potted plants, the plants can be hardened off during spring by opening the roof when the outside weather is suitable. This can save labor for moving plants outside. High winds or rain can prevent opening the roofs for cooling or ventilation, so adding side vents could help.

For improved crop production and quality, a careful selection of greenhouse structure, glazing, and climate control system is required. All greenhouses should be designed properly to withstand all possible load factors for safety and proper functionality purposes. The National Greenhouse Manufacturers Association (NGMA) publishes standards that gives guidance for determining design loads for greenhouses.

For more information, go to www.ngma.com.

1

Choose The Right Greenhouse Style

Murat Kacira ([email protected]) is an associate professor in the Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering at the University of Arizona. See all author stories here.

Further reading:
Why is silica dispersant Better?

Thinking of Automating?

David Kuack

Horizontal vs. Vertical Centrifugal Pumps
Production Process | Taiwan-Based E-Barrier Wheel Seals ...

When talking about which country has the most high-tech automation for controlled environment food production, the Netherlands would likely be top of mind. Chris Higgins, president of Hort Americas, a commercial horticultural supply company in Bedford, Texas, said a problem that often occurs with controlled environment food production is that the industry tends to talk about high tech and low tech without regard to what an individual grower may need.

“The reality on the farm side is we should be talking about right tech. Many people in the industry have allowed a Venlo glass greenhouse to dictate how U.S. growers think about technology in most high-tech applications,” Chris said. “Some U.S. growers may think because they don’t have Venlo greenhouses they can’t have high-tech operations.”

Chris talked about the hundreds of acres of strawberries grown in high tunnels in California equipped with raised gutters on fence posts as proof that not everything about an operation has to be high tech.

“The reason these high-tunnel structures work so well for controlled environment strawberry production is because the climate for production is almost perfect,” he added. “Why should growers build greenhouses if they aren’t needed? Does that mean that this technology is low tech?”

For example, he said, the definition of high tech may not apply in this case if referring to controlling the temperature and humidity. But the high tunnels may be equipped with a high-tech irrigation system. Chris noted these strawberry growers are looking to invest in advanced robotics systems that can assist in harvesting, spraying or transportation, as well.

“Requirements of technology will be based more on solving different problems for farms of different sizes based on what that farm can afford to support growth or profitability,” he said. “Why invest in high tech if a grower doesn’t need it?”

Lowering labor, energy costs

Chris pointed out the two biggest areas growers have issues with today and over the last few years are labor and utility costs.

“The inflation tied to those two categories on the growers’ balance sheets has outpaced the cost of price increases farms can put on the products they produce,” he said. “If there is technology that allows growers to address labor and utilities, that is where they should be making their investments.”

Whenever food is being grown in a controlled environment in a climate that isn’t conducive to production year-round, energy in the form of utilities is being used to manipulate the climate, he said. This could include supplementing light or lowering or raising the temperature. Savings on utilities is highly dependent on the geographical location and what utility a grower is using the most. These calculations for energy costs are relatively easy to determine.

“How much energy savings are being realized? How many running hours are on a piece of equipment per year?” he asked. “A grower can determine the savings versus the investment in new equipment and if that number is between three to five years payback, the grower should seriously consider an upgrade. The only thing that is guaranteed is the cost of labor and the cost of energy will continue to increase.”

Improving efficiency

While labor and energy costs are two of the biggest issues growers are facing, Joe Swartz, vice president at AmHydro, a horticultural hydroponic systems designer and builder in Arcata, California, said there’s no single automation solution to resolving these issues.

“There are so many factors involved,” Joe said. “Not only the type of automation, but also the level of automation and the specific automation application. Automation application in some instances involves automating repetitive labor tasks. In other cases, logic or using some artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning focusing on data collection and/or analysis is driving what a grower needs.”

Clockwise from top left: One objective of the Small Greenhouse and Farm Technology project is to assist small growers to identify their current level of technology adoption and help them determine where to make their next equipment/automation investment. ■ High-tech controlled environment food production can vary for the crop and geographic location. Depending on location and climate, high tunnels or greenhouses can be equipped with high-tech environmental controls and irrigation systems. ■ A grower pain point is moving material from one area to another or throughout a whole facility. Small growers can invest in carts or trolleys, while larger operations may invest in automated conveyor belts. ■ Since labor and energy costs will continue to increase, technology that enables growers to address these issues is where they should consider making their automation investments.

Joe said most growers come to AmHydro to improve or increase efficiency, looking for cost savings through process efficiencies, as well as finding better ways to implement food safety or workplace safety. What it essentially boils down to is either making more money for the growers or freeing up more time or a combination of those two.

“We don’t have growers who come to us and say we need to cut down on our labor. It’s much more of a holistic approach. How can they streamline and make their operations work better?” Joe said. “That is one of the things that drives what growers should be looking at with regards to automation. In order to streamline their operations, growers need to produce more using less, and they need to do it faster and better.”

Reducing pain points

Joe said many existing growers are looking to cut their costs and need to lower their labor requirements.

“Labor has become a pain point for a lot of growers,” he said, adding many existing growers feel they have to automate specific processes because of the labor costs. They’re hearing from companies out there that are creating automation equipment and essentially telling growers to purchase this automation technology because it’s so advanced.

“We’re commercial growers at AmHydro, so we are looking at the big picture of how we improve a process. A lot of times we will see something in a process—this could be a method or actual technology that has been implemented and is causing the problem,” Joe said. “We are trying to make growers successful. Sometimes it only takes a little nudge in the right direction or some guidance in ways where they can fix the problem with the tools they already have.”

He said another common pain point facing all size growers is material handling. Whether it’s an automated system that moves plants throughout an operation or moves product from one section to another, he said, material handling applies across the board for all size operations. This includes the small grower who’s invested in a couple carts or monorail trollies to save on labor and create a safer working environment. For larger operations, improving material handling may incorporate automated conveyor systems that move everything from plants to equipment around a facility.

“This can also include processing equipment used in packing areas, such as container-filling and packaging machines, as well as palletizing and shipping logistics automation,” he noted. “Other considerations might include crop scouting or health analysis, which could involve automation in dosing systems covering nutrition and water management.”

Advocating for small growers

For small-scale controlled environment growers who are doing both outdoor field and indoor greenhouse food crops, the decision where to spend their money on equipment and automation can be even more daunting.

“Growers face tough decisions over whether to spend limited dollars outdoors or indoors,” said Peter Konjoian, founder of Konjoian’s Horticulture Education Services in Andover, Massachusetts. Peter grew up on a 5-acre family farm and was involved with operating a 55,000-sq.-ft. greenhouse used for ornamental plant production. He recently started the Small Greenhouse and Farm Technology (SGAFT) project. He’s working with Michelle Klieger, an agricultural economist and strategist, to provide growers with insight as to the factors that need to be considered when making equipment-buying decisions.

“How does the potential of more crop turns in the greenhouse compare to seasonal outdoor production?” Peter said. “The answer can identify where the investment in technology should be made.”

The SGAFT website will provide educational materials tailored to smaller operations. The website will show growers what state-of-the-art technology is and where it’s headed, but most of the information will focus on the technology that they can afford to implement in their operations.

“One objective of the project is to help small growers embrace the big picture, identify their current level of technology adoption and target what’s next,” he said. “Understanding where they are and what the next step is results in better decisions about where to spend their next dollar.”

Peter is working on describing automation technology within several different categories, including irrigation, environmental controls and glazing. Which category is going to return the most on a grower’s investment and which is going to eliminate or remove some of the human error involved in growing quality crops?

“Each category has its technology ladder and each ladder identifies a progressive increase in technology from entry level on the bottom step to state-of-the-art on the highest,” he said. “There’s never enough money to do everything, so making good decisions is key.

“Another objective is managing the pressure small growers place on themselves trying to achieve the highest level of technology in one step. We don’t skip steps climbing an actual ladder, that’s dangerous and irresponsible.”

A consideration that Michelle has emphasized is where growers are going to purchase their next hour of time.

“Growers also benefit from understanding where their next dollar will buy that coveted extra hour of time to be more productive,” Peter added.  

Contact us to discuss your requirements of what is a container farm. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.

 

David Kuack is a freelance technical writer in Fort Worth, Texas. He can be reached at dkuack@gmail.com.

 

Choose The Right Greenhouse Style

Advertisement

Editor’s Note: Dr. Kacira is an associate professor in the Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department and Controlled Environment Agriculture Center at the University of Arizona.

Many elements must be taken into consideration when choosing the type of greenhouse to construct. Numerous factors for greenhouse design and technology selection must be looked at before building. Some things to consider include: market size and infrastructure in the region; climate of the site; plant requirements; water quality and accessibility; cost of land; zoning restrictions; availability of materials, equipment, and services; accessible labor source; and capital availability for investment, economics, and marketing.

The anticipated production quantity and quality also play a role when selecting a design. A reasonable balance needs to be established based on market demand, grower skills, expected economic return, and level of greenhouse technology selected for crop production.

Greenhouse styles can vary from small stand-alone structures to large gutter-connected greenhouses. Greenhouse designs can be simply classified as attached (i.e. lean-to), free standing (i.e. even-span, uneven span, Quonset, arch), and ridge-furrow or gutter connected (i.e. sawtooth, venlo). There are many designs and structures to select from, thus it is important to become familiar with the advantages and disadvantages of each. Here is a brief rundown of some of the styles available to growers.

Free Standing Styles
Free standing greenhouses are either an A-frame type or feature an arch/curvilinear roof shape. Arch roof structures provide good light transmission and are less costly to construct than peak-roof structures. Arch-roof greenhouses (also known as gothic) are also adaptable to both rigid and flexible glazing materials.

Arch-type structures can be modified into several designs. For instance, Quonset greenhouses when designed low to the ground can be used as cold frames for nursery purposes or as high tunnel greenhouses for vegetable production. The glazing is usually plastic. Quonset sidewall height is low, which can restrict storage space and headroom. This type of greenhouse can be placed on columns, enabling plants to grow taller to meet crop requirements.

The gothic-type greenhouse is similar to that of the Quonset but it has a “gothic” shape, featuring an arch and a pointed ridge. This shape allows more headroom at the sidewall than does the Quonset, and it can prevent snow build-up on the roof in colder climates.

Ridge And Furrow Styles
The ridge and furrow type greenhouse consists of a number of even span greenhouses connected along the length of the greenhouse. All shared walls are removed providing more growing space. These greenhouses are sometimes called gutter-connected. The ridge and furrow configuration is applicable to most of the commercial style greenhouses used for floriculture and vegetable production.

Gutter-connected greenhouses are less expensive to build, conserve ground area, and require less heating cost per ground area compared to stand-alone structures. In addition, gutter-connected greenhouses have less roof and wall area relative to floor area, so they are more energy-efficient. There are some disadvantages, however, including reduced light due to shadow from eaves and other structural elements, and snow accumulation over the eaves.

Another modified version of a ridge and furrow greenhouse is the Venlo style. The gable ends of Venlo structures are very narrow. The slim gable end allows for thinner bar use, and wider, single panes of glass glazing to be used on the roof. The Venlo style construction allows improved light transmission, enabling a high percentage of winter light to reach the crop. These structures originate from Dutch horticulture and are used widely in the Netherlands; however, they are also adopted by growers in Northern climates where reduced winter sunlight tends to be a limiting factor for crop growth.

Retractable Roof Or Open Roof
Designed as flat roof or A-frame type, retractable roof greenhouses can be used for basic protection of crops or as a complete crop production system with stationary or retractable insect screening, curtains for shading, heat retention, and perimeter walls with roll-up curtains with insect screening. They can allow the grower to open the structure completely or partially, providing higher rates of ventilation as well as more light for the crop. Generally used for ridge-furrow style structures, retractable-roof greenhouses have minimal climate control.

Offering the best of both worlds, open-roof greenhouses provide a natural environment for crops when the outside climate is suitable, and provide an artificial and protected environment when the outside is too cold or hot for crop production. Greenhouse air temperature can be maintained within one or two degrees of outside temperature with minimal or no energy required.
Often used by growers of perennials, baskets, and other potted plants, the plants can be hardened off during spring by opening the roof when the outside weather is suitable. This can save labor for moving plants outside. High winds or rain can prevent opening the roofs for cooling or ventilation, so adding side vents could help.

For improved crop production and quality, a careful selection of greenhouse structure, glazing, and climate control system is required. All greenhouses should be designed properly to withstand all possible load factors for safety and proper functionality purposes. The National Greenhouse Manufacturers Association (NGMA) publishes standards that gives guidance for determining design loads for greenhouses.

For more information, go to www.ngma.com.

1

Choose The Right Greenhouse Style

Murat Kacira ([email protected]) is an associate professor in the Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering at the University of Arizona. See all author stories here.

For more Strawberry growing greenhouse hydroponics systeminformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.

122

0

Comments

Please Join Us to post.

0/2000

All Comments ( 0 )

Guest Posts

If you are interested in sending in a Guest Blogger Submission,welcome to write for us!

Your Name: (required)

Your Email: (required)

Subject:

Your Message: (required)